Skip to content

Custom assertion without expectation#74

Merged
haraldmaida merged 4 commits intomainfrom
feat/custom_assertion_without_expectation
Feb 15, 2026
Merged

Custom assertion without expectation#74
haraldmaida merged 4 commits intomainfrom
feat/custom_assertion_without_expectation

Conversation

@haraldmaida
Copy link
Member

Little changes to be able to write custom assertion methods without the need of providing a custom expectation as well.

@haraldmaida haraldmaida self-assigned this Feb 15, 2026
@haraldmaida haraldmaida added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 15, 2026
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 15, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 83.33333% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 93.73%. Comparing base (17237a3) to head (54da30d).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/spec/mod.rs 83.33% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #74      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   93.89%   93.73%   -0.16%     
==========================================
  Files          32       32              
  Lines        4714     4579     -135     
  Branches     4714     4579     -135     
==========================================
- Hits         4426     4292     -134     
+ Misses        248      247       -1     
  Partials       40       40              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@haraldmaida haraldmaida merged commit 6baa52f into main Feb 15, 2026
18 of 20 checks passed
@haraldmaida haraldmaida deleted the feat/custom_assertion_without_expectation branch February 15, 2026 09:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant